By isolating material that is found in Matthew and only in Matthew, or isolating material that is found in Luke and only in Luke, or isolating material found in Mark and only in Mark, we get clues as to the audience to which the author was directing his information and also his major themes in the particular gospel. Wherever we land in our conclusions about the method by which the gospel writers compiled their texts, the very analysis that we have seen gives us one clear benefit. Scholars differ as to whether the alleged Q-source was a written source shared by Matthew and Luke, or simply an oral tradition they both had access to. Much of this analysis is speculative and hypothetical. That is to say, the Q-source is a source that is unknown to us but known to the gospel writers Matthew and Luke. That letter Q is used since it is the first letter of the German word quelle, which is simply the word for source.

This second independent source is called simply the 'Q-source.' The working hypothesis is that Matthew and Luke, in addition to having Mark as a source for their information, had a second independent source that Mark did not use. The scholars then try to account for this common information found in these two gospels that is absent from Mark's gospel. At the same time, there is common material found in Luke and in Matthew that is not found in Mark. This is seen by an analysis of Matthew and Luke - both Matthew and Luke have material in their gospels that is common to the gospel of Mark. Must complete annual Workplace Violence Prevention Program/Certificate, per hospital policy, during initial training/orientation but not to exceed 30 days from. The general assumption among source critics is that Mark was the first written gospel. Patient Care Tech- Med/Surg/Tele 5th Per Diem Nights.

Q luther